Going Back to the Basics? An argument against using Web Frameworks.

There is a growing movement in the web development community to return to the basics of building websites using just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. This approach often referred to as “vanilla” web development, is seen as an alternative to using frameworks such as React, Vue, and Angular.

One of the main arguments for using vanilla web development is that it allows for greater flexibility and control over the final product. Frameworks can be restrictive in terms of the design and layout of a website while using just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript allows for complete freedom in how the website is built. Additionally, using vanilla web development allows developers to have a deeper understanding of how the website is functioning and how it is interacting with the browser, which can be beneficial for troubleshooting and debugging.

Another argument for using vanilla web development is that it can be more performant than using frameworks. Frameworks often add an additional layer of abstraction between the developer and the browser, which can lead to slower load times and increased memory usage. By using just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, the browser can render the website more efficiently and quickly.

There are also benefits to using vanilla web development in terms of maintainability and scalability. Frameworks are constantly evolving and updating, which can make it difficult to keep up with the latest changes. With vanilla web development, the codebase is simpler and more straightforward, making it easier to maintain and update over time. Additionally, since the codebase is not tied to a specific framework, it can be more easily scaled and adapted to new technologies in the future.

However, it’s important to note that using frameworks can be beneficial in certain situations, such as when building complex, large-scale applications. Frameworks like React and Vue provide a set of tools and best practices that can make it easier to manage and organize large codebases. They also often provide additional features such as state management and built-in performance optimization.

In conclusion, there are valid arguments for using vanilla web development instead of frameworks when building websites. Vanilla web development allows for greater flexibility and control, can be more performant, and is generally easier to maintain and scale. However, it’s important to evaluate the specific needs of a project and weigh the pros and cons of each approach before making a decision.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.