So You Wanna Build an A.I. Agent? Here’s How to Actually Get Started


Building an A.I. Agent

Building AI agents that can reason, make decisions, and help automate tasks sounds like something out of a sci-fi movie, right? But it’s not the future anymore — it’s the now. From self-writing code assistants to research bots that summarize long reports for you, AI agents are changing the way we work and think. But how do you go from zero to building something like that yourself?

If you’re someone with a programming background (even basic), and you’re curious about building smart, autonomous tools — this guide is for you.

Let’s break it down into a doable learning path.


Step 1: Nail the Basics of AI and Machine Learning

First things first — you need to know how AI actually works. Not just the buzzwords, but the real stuff under the hood.

Learn what machine learning is, how neural networks make predictions, and how large language models (LLMs) — the engines behind today’s smart agents — actually process and generate responses. You don’t have to become a data scientist, but you should understand how models are trained, how they learn from data, and what their limitations are.

While you’re at it, brush up on Python — the language nearly all modern AI tooling is built on.


Step 2: Understand How Agents Think

Now we’re talking agents. In AI-speak, an agent is basically something that can observe the world, make decisions, and take action to meet its goals. You’ll come across different kinds of agents: reactive ones, goal-based agents, utility-based ones, and learning agents that adapt over time.

This is where things get really interesting. Agents don’t just spit out answers — they have memory, planning strategies, even reasoning loops. Understanding the fundamentals here will set you up for everything that comes next.


Step 3: Play With Real Tools — LangChain, AutoGPT, and Friends

This is where theory meets real-world action.

Today’s hottest agent frameworks are built on top of large language models (think GPT-style models). Tools like LangChain, AutoGPT, BabyAGI, and CrewAI let you build autonomous agents that can use tools, search the web, execute code, and even collaborate with other agents.

You’ll learn how to:

  • Connect your AI to tools like calculators or file readers
  • Set up planning steps (like “plan → search → decide → act”)
  • Build memory so your agent remembers what it did earlier
  • Use vector databases for knowledge retrieval

Start with a small project — maybe a task manager agent or a research summarizer. Keep it simple, but hands-on.


Step 4: Give Your Agents a Brain (Memory, Planning, Tools)

Basic agents are cool, but real power comes from combining memory and tools. Want your AI to remember a conversation? Feed it a memory module. Want it to pick the right tool for the job? Teach it to make decisions and choose functions.

This is where things like Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), tool use, and even multi-agent systems come into play. You’ll find yourself mixing logic, state machines, and API calls in new and creative ways.

There are even frameworks now where multiple agents collaborate like a team — a project manager agent assigns tasks to worker agents, who then report back. Wild, right?


Step 5: Build, Break, Repeat

Once you’ve got a handle on how agents work, start experimenting. Build projects. Break stuff. Try giving your agent tasks that require multiple steps, decisions, or collaboration.

Some fun project ideas:

  • A debugging agent that fixes broken Python scripts
  • An AI assistant that can schedule your meetings and send follow-ups
  • A research bot that digs through PDFs and gives you a summary

Don’t be afraid to go deep. This space is new and rapidly evolving, so half the fun is figuring it out as you go.


Keep Your Ethics in Check

AI agents are powerful, and with great power comes… well, you know the rest. As you explore what’s possible, it’s worth learning about the ethical side too — safety, alignment, transparency, and making sure your agent doesn’t go rogue and delete your entire drive (it happens).

There are tons of great discussions happening around the ethics of autonomous agents, so stay curious and stay grounded.


Final Thoughts

Learning how to build AI agents isn’t just a fun side quest — it’s a smart investment. Whether you’re into automating workflows, building products, or just curious about where tech is headed, this is one of the most exciting areas in software today.

Start with the basics. Don’t rush it. Get your hands dirty. And before long, you’ll have an agent that’s doing stuff for you — and maybe even thinking a few steps ahead.


Does A.I. help or slow down developers?


Is AI Slowing Down Senior Developers—and Is It Worth It for Business?

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and chatbot-based coding assistants promise to enhance productivity in the workplace. Yet emerging evidence suggests that experienced developers often experience slower performance when using these tools—and this raises important questions about their usefulness in high-skill business contexts.


What the Research Shows: Senior Developers May Be Slower with AI

  • A controlled trial by METR involving 16 veteran developers using tools like Cursor Pro and Claude Sonnet found that AI increased task completion time by ~19%, despite participants expecting a 20–24% speed-up. Time was lost reviewing and correcting flawed outputs and dealing with context mismatches.
  • Another controlled Google study with 96 full-time engineers found a 21% reduction in time spent, but specifically observed that developers with more code experience benefited more—suggesting the effectiveness of AI varies significantly across experience levels .

Broader Industry Findings: Productivity Gains Are Real—but Uneven

  • Stack Overflow’s Developer Survey (2024): Most users report satisfaction and perceived productivity increases with tools like GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT. However, 38% of users say the code was inaccurate half the time, and many questioned reliability. Nearly half believe AI performs poorly on complex tasks, with mistrust of output (66%) and lack of project context (63%) commonly cited issues.
  • Qodo’s AI code quality report (June 2025): 78% of developers say AI tools improved productivity, but 65% say AI misses critical task context, and 76% don’t fully trust generated code—necessitating manual review that slows workflows.
  • LeadDev Engineering Leadership Report (June 2025): Among 617 senior engineering leaders surveyed, only 6% saw significant productivity improvements from coding AIs, and 39% observed small gains of 1–10%.

Experimental Studies: Junior vs. Senior Developer Benefit

  • A McKinsey case study shows generative AI can cut time spent on tasks like documentation or refactoring by up to 50%, but carries warning that domain-specific complexities require careful implementation for sustained benefits.
  • In a field experiment at Microsoft and Accenture, Copilot users generated 26% more pull requests per week, but productivity gains were significantly higher for junior developers; senior developers saw no statistically significant improvement in several cases.
  • Another randomized experiment reported tasks completed nearly 56% faster when using AI pair programming—though this largely benefitted less experienced users.
  • MIT Sloan analysis similarly found that AI assistance yields small speed gains but slight quality reductions for highly experienced professionals, while lifting both speed and quality for lower-skilled workers.

Why Do Senior Developers Often Slow Down?

  • Context mismatch: AI lacks deep awareness of proprietary codebases, architectural patterns, and business logic—leading to suggestions that require heavy validation or rejection.
  • Review overhead: Experienced developers report spending more time verifying and cleaning AI output than writing code manually—especially for complex or critical tasks (IT Pro, TIME).
  • Trust gap: Many professionals don’t fully trust AI-generated code, especially in high-stakes production environments, which undermines adoption (PR Newswire).

Should Businesses Still Use AI Tools?

Yes—but with caution. The value of AI tools depends heavily on the user and task:

  • For junior or less experienced developers, or for well-scoped repetitive tasks like documentation, boilerplate, or initial prototyping, studies consistently show meaningful productivity gains (20–50%).
  • For senior professionals, the benefits are far smaller—and may even reverse, especially when tools are applied to complex, context-rich tasks. Manual overhead and mistrust can outweigh any time saved.
  • In other domains such as support, marketing, or finance, composable AI has been shown experimentally to improve throughput on common tasks by ~15% on average—but with greater gains for less-experienced employees. High-skill workers may see minimal benefit or slight quality tradeoffs.

Practical Guidelines for Businesses Considering AI

  1. Define clear use cases—focus on low-complexity, high-volume tasks where AI has demonstrated consistent gains.
  2. Involve senior staff early in evaluation and rollout to assess real-world fit.
  3. Provide training in prompt design and oversight—not just tool usage.
  4. Monitor real productivity metrics—don’t rely solely on perceived or anecdotal improvements.
  5. Ensure human-in-the-loop review for complex areas to maintain code quality and security.

References

  1. Paradis et al. (Google RCT): ~21% faster development time with AI for some users (arXiv)
  2. METR real-world trial with seniors: AI increased task time ~19% (IT Pro)
  3. Stack Overflow Developer Survey: user satisfaction vs. accuracy concerns (codesignal.dev)
  4. Qodo report (June 2025): widespread adoption but major trust/context issues (PR Newswire)
  5. LeadDev Engineering Leadership Report: only 6% report major gains (LeadDev)
  6. McKinsey case study: time savings, dependent on domain complexity (McKinsey & Company)
  7. Field experiment at Microsoft/Accenture: 26% more PRs, junior-most gains (InfoQ)
  8. Lab experiment: 55.8% faster with AI pair programming for novices (arXiv)
  9. MIT Sloan / Brynjolfsson et al.: heterogeneity by skill (arXiv)

Final Thoughts

Yes, AI coding assistants and chatbots show real productivity benefits in controlled and real-world settings—but those gains are heavily skewed toward junior developers and routine tasks. For senior developers and complex workflows, current-generation tools may slow progress unless carefully scoped and managed. Businesses should adopt AI strategically—focusing on the right use cases, measuring actual impact, and preserving human oversight.

Can we create a MENTAT school?


Toward a Mentat School: A Human Cognitive Response to Artificial Intelligence

As artificial intelligence continues to evolve at an unprecedented pace, there is growing interest in enhancing human cognitive performance—not just through technology, but through disciplined training of the mind itself. One theoretical framework for such a development comes from Frank Herbert’s Dune universe: the Mentat—a human trained to perform data analysis, decision-making, and pattern recognition at a level rivalling or exceeding machine intelligence. While fictional, the idea of training a human “computer” raises valid questions in neuroscience and education: Can we systematically train the human brain to optimize memory, reasoning, and intelligence in a structured environment?

This article explores the theoretical underpinnings and proposed structure of a real-world Mentat School, based on verifiable findings in cognitive science, neuroplasticity, and educational psychology.


Cognitive Enhancement Through Training

Modern research strongly supports the idea that specific forms of mental training can lead to measurable improvements in cognitive performance. Techniques such as working memory training, dual n-back exercises, and spaced repetition systems (SRS)—like those used in language-learning tools such as Anki—have been shown to enhance memory and attention capacity (Jaeggi et al., 2008; Carpenter et al., 2012).

Further, deliberate practice in problem-solving and logical reasoning, such as those employed in mathematics, philosophy, and chess, correlates with improvements in fluid intelligence (Sala & Gobet, 2017). These enhancements do not make someone superhuman, but a structured program combining them can yield significantly above-average performance over time.


Educational Foundations of a Mentat School

A Mentat School would blend ancient techniques of mental discipline with modern cognitive science. Key elements might include:

  1. Memory Systems Training: Students would learn mnemonic systems such as the method of loci, peg systems, and chunking, as well as practice long-form memorization (used by competitive memorizers and oral tradition cultures).
  2. Critical Thinking and Logic: Borrowing from the trivium (grammar, logic, rhetoric), students would engage in structured argumentation, dialectical reasoning, and formal logic training—similar to debate and philosophy curricula.
  3. Mathematical and Probabilistic Reasoning: Inspired by Bayesian decision theory and heuristics research (Kahneman & Tversky), students would be taught to think probabilistically, estimate outcomes, and update beliefs rationally.
  4. Sensory Data Training: Analogous to observational disciplines like forensics or Sherlock Holmes’ method, students would train their attention through mindfulness, observational exercises, and pattern recognition drills.
  5. Cognitive Load and Focus Management: Emphasis would be placed on mindfulness, meta-cognition, and Pomodoro-style timeboxing to optimize attention and avoid mental fatigue—essential in a world flooded with information.

Implementation Model

A practical Mentat School could be structured similarly to elite academic institutions or specialized bootcamps. Programs would be immersive, with rigorous daily regimens focusing on measurable skill acquisition. Much like language immersion or military intelligence schools, participants would undergo continuous assessment and feedback.

Curriculum design would follow Mastery Learning models (Bloom, 1968), ensuring students only progress after demonstrating proficiency. Incorporation of AI-based tutoring systems (e.g., Khan Academy’s mastery-based learning AI) could assist instructors and personalize education at scale.

Virtual or hybrid delivery could democratize access. Students from diverse backgrounds could be trained using open-source tools and virtual mentors—reminiscent of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), but far more interactive and intensive.


Ethical and Societal Implications

Training humans to become “Mentats” raises ethical questions. Who gets access? What are the risks of cognitive overreach or burnout? Could such training exacerbate inequality if only available to elites?

Nonetheless, the proposal offers a hopeful counterweight to techno-pessimism. In a future where AI systems challenge human utility, cultivating peak human cognition may be one of the best ways to maintain autonomy, relevance, and creativity.

As AI continues to climb, a Mentat School could ground us—not in competition with machines, but in conscious mastery of our most vital asset: the human mind.


References:

  • Jaeggi, S. M., et al. (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. PNAS.
  • Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2017). Does chess instruction improve school achievement? Educational Research Review.
  • Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for Mastery. UCLA-CSEIP.
  • Carpenter, S. K., et al. (2012). Using spacing to enhance diverse forms of learning: Review of recent research and implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review.
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica.

Trading Bots created through Artificial Intelligence – Their Benefits and Drawbacks

Using an A.I. created trading bot can provide a number of benefits to investors, such as reducing emotional biases and increasing efficiency in executing trades. However, there are also potential drawbacks that investors should be aware of before using a trading bot in their portfolio.

Benefits of using an A.I. trading bot:

  1. Reducing Emotional Biases: One of the biggest benefits of using a trading bot is that it eliminates emotional biases that can influence investment decisions. Investors often make decisions based on their emotions rather than objective data, which can lead to poor investment outcomes. A trading bot, on the other hand, makes decisions based on pre-programmed rules and data analysis, which removes any emotional bias from the process.
  2. Increased Efficiency: A trading bot can execute trades more efficiently than a human trader. A bot can analyze large amounts of data quickly and accurately, making it easier to identify market trends and opportunities. This can lead to more profitable trades and higher returns.
  3. 24/7 Availability: A trading bot can monitor the market 24/7, which is impossible for a human trader to do. This means that the bot can identify opportunities and execute trades even when the investor is not actively monitoring the market.
  4. Consistency: A trading bot will execute trades based on pre-programmed rules, ensuring that it adheres to the same strategy consistently. This consistency can help to minimize risk and increase the probability of success over time.

Drawbacks of using an A.I. trading bot:

  1. Technical Issues: Trading bots are complex pieces of software, and technical issues can arise that can lead to losses. For example, if the bot malfunctions or loses connectivity to the internet, it may not be able to execute trades as intended. These technical issues can lead to significant losses if not addressed quickly.
  2. Lack of Flexibility: A trading bot operates based on pre-programmed rules, which means that it may not be able to adapt to changes in the market or unexpected events. This lack of flexibility can be a disadvantage in certain situations, such as during a sudden market crash or a major geopolitical event.
  3. Inaccurate Data Analysis: A trading bot relies on accurate data analysis to make investment decisions. If the data used by the bot is inaccurate or outdated, it may make incorrect decisions that can lead to losses.
  4. Over-Reliance on Technology: Using a trading bot may lead to over-reliance on technology and a lack of human oversight. While a bot can be programmed to minimize risk, it cannot account for all possible scenarios. Human oversight is still necessary to ensure that the bot is functioning as intended and to make adjustments when necessary.

Using an A.I.-created trading bot can provide significant benefits to investors, such as reducing emotional biases and increasing efficiency in executing trades. However, there are also potential drawbacks that investors should be aware of before using a trading bot in their portfolio. It is important to carefully consider the potential benefits and drawbacks and to have a clear understanding of the bot’s capabilities and limitations before making a decision to use one. Additionally, investors should regularly monitor the performance of the bot and be prepared to make adjustments as needed to ensure that it continues to meet their investment goals.

Privacy Preference Center

Necessary

Advertising

This is used to send you advertisements that help support this website

Google Adsense
adwords.google.com

Analytics

To track a person

analytics.google.com
analytics.google.com

Other